Scenario: A Short-Term Rental with a Property Manager

By AE Tax Advisors | Educational guide | Updated September 2026

Scenario Library / Short-Term Rental Scenarios / Scenario: A Short-Term Rental with a Property Manager

This page describes a composite hypothetical. It is not a real client or a real result. Hours and amounts are assumptions for illustration.

The Scenario in Brief

An investor buys a short-term rental in a resort town far from home and hires a full-service property manager to handle bookings, guest communication, cleaning coordination, and maintenance. The investor is pleased with the arrangement, since it requires little time. At tax time, the investor asks the advisor whether the rental losses can offset other income.

Assumptions Used

Testing Material Participation

The advisor would go through the tests.

TestRequirementResult on assumed facts
500 hoursmore than 500 hours by the investornot met, 60 hours
Substantially all participationinvestor's participation substantially all of the totalnot met, manager did most of the work
More than 100 hours and at least as much as anyone elsemore than 100 hours and no one else morenot met, 60 hours and the manager had 420
Facts and circumstancesregular, continuous, substantial, generally more than 100 hours, and no one else compensated for managingnot met, the manager is paid to manage

On these facts, the investor would not materially participate, and the activity would be passive. The advisor would also note that some of the investor's hours, such as reviewing financial statements, are the kind of investor-type activity that generally does not count as participation.

The Result

ItemAmount
Revenue70,000 dollars
Operating expenses before depreciation55,000 dollars
Net income before depreciation15,000 dollars
Depreciation40,000 dollars
Net loss25,000 dollars

The 25,000 dollar loss is passive. The investor has 20,000 dollars of passive income from the limited partnership. Passive losses can generally offset passive income, so 20,000 dollars of the loss could offset the partnership income in the year, and the remaining 5,000 dollars would be suspended and carried forward. At an assumed 32 percent rate, the tax effect of using 20,000 dollars against passive income is about 6,400 dollars, arithmetic on assumptions. The advisor would ask the investor to confirm the passive income and its character.

Could the Investor Change the Facts?

The advisor would discuss whether the investor might want to change the way the property is managed, for example by handling guest communication and pricing personally and using the manager only for cleaning and maintenance. That change could shift the hours in the investor's favor. But the advisor would caution that operating decisions should be made for business reasons. A property in a distant resort town may not be practical for the investor to run, and a poor operating choice to obtain a tax result would be a mistake. The investor might also decide that accepting passive treatment is fine, since the investment does not depend on the deduction.

Records the Advisor Would Recommend Anyway

Even with passive treatment, the advisor would ask for the manager's statements, the booking report showing the average stay, and a log of the investor's activities. The booking report supports the classification of the activity, and the manager's statements support income and expenses. The investor's log would show that the participation tests were tested and not met, which helps if the classification is ever questioned.

Later Years and Sale

The suspended loss would carry forward and could be used against future passive income or released on a taxable sale to an unrelated party. If the property produces net income in the future, the suspended losses could offset it. The advisor would also discuss state filing for a property in another state. See the nonresident rental scenario in this library.

Scenario Variations Worth Considering

If the investor had no passive income, the entire loss would be suspended. If the manager handled only cleaning and the investor handled bookings and guest messages, the participation picture could be different. If the property had been a long-term rental, the passive treatment would apply regardless of hours. If the investor qualified as a real estate professional, other rules could apply.

Risks and Limits

What This Scenario Teaches

Hiring a full-service manager is a legitimate choice, and it usually results in passive treatment. The tax outcome should be understood in advance, so that the investor can decide whether the investment works on those terms.

Questions to Bring to Your Advisor

  1. What are the participation results under the seven tests for my facts?
  2. How much passive income do I have to absorb the loss?
  3. Would changing the manager's role make business sense?
  4. How will I track suspended losses?

Frequently Asked Questions

Does hiring a manager always make a short-term rental passive?

Not always, but a manager doing most of the work can defeat several participation tests.

Is this scenario based on a real property?

No. It is a composite hypothetical.

Want to Talk Through Your Own Situation?

These scenarios are illustrations only. Book a discovery call with AE Tax Advisors to discuss the facts of your own business or portfolio.

Book a Discovery Call

Educational purposes only. This page is an illustrative educational scenario, not tax, legal, or accounting advice, and it does not describe a real client or a real result. Tax laws change and outcomes depend on individual facts, so consult a qualified professional before acting. No result is guaranteed.